In
January, the Library Company hosted the Philadelphia regional meeting of the National
Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) featuring a slate of speakers representing
some of the most influential thinking in digital preservation today. Storage of
digital assets and their preservation is now a critical function of all GLAM
institutions (Galleries, Libraries, Archives,
and Museums) and is a particularly pressing concern for small
institutions trying to keep pace with increasing demands for digital content.
The NDSA
Philly Regional meeting convened mid-Atlantic institutions to encourage new
collaborations to meet the shared demands. Members of the Philadelphia Area
Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL),
PhillyDH, and the Delaware Valley Archivists
Group (DVAG) were in attendance.
The event was attended by almost 150 people and, scheduled on the cusp of the American Library Association Mid-Winter Conference, also drew attendees from as far as North
Carolina, Florida, Colorado, and Washington.
The
event was kicked off with a brief welcome by Library Company Director John Van
Horne and an introduction by Erin Engle, Digital Archivist with the National
Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program (NDIIPP) at the
Library of Congress. Engle gave an
overview of the NDSA’s structure and mission, emphasizing the organization’s advocacy
on behalf of members and the resulting reports, guidance materials, meetings,
events, and webinars. As an example, she cited the “2014 National Agenda for
Digital Stewardship,” an insightful look into the current state of digital
preservation, trends, and guidance for decision-makers and funders.
This was
followed by a compelling keynote by Emily Gore, DPLA Director for Content,
entitled "Building the Digital Public Library of America: Successes,
Challenges and Future Directions." The theme of sustainability emerged as
she described the development of the DPLA and how it became clear that the hub
model was the best strategy for the long-term success of the project. The
establishment of hubs to aggregate content for DPLA will be more feasible than to
attempt to manage the assets of innumerable individual institutions centrally. DPLA
has tasked those repositories that wish to contribute content with the
management of data aggregation, metadata consistency, continual repository services,
promoting new digitization, encouraging community engagement, and
self-evaluation for the improvement of existing and development of new DPLA
hubs.
The keynote was followed by a series of lightning
talks that focused on standards for preservation, digitization, and
description. A comprehensive list of the issues that must be addressed in any collaborative
digitization strategy emerged from these sessions; attendees agreed that
consistency could ensure success where conformity was unattainable.
Meg Phillips, National Archives and Records
Administration External Affairs Liaison, presented on NDSA Levels of Digital Preservation, “a tiered set of recommendations for how
organizations should begin to build or enhance their digital preservation
activities.” She emphasized the importance of this document as a tool for
self-assessment, program planning, and institutional advocacy, and as a way to
open communication with content creators. The success of the document lies in a
simple descriptive format that is content-agnostic. It includes four levels of
preservation—protect your data, know your data, monitor your data, and repair your
data—across five functions: storage and geographic location, file fixity and
data integrity, information security, metadata, and file formats.
Ian Bogus, MacDonald Curator of Preservation at
the University of Pennsylvania Libraries, gave a talk entitled “Why Create a
Standard on Digitization? An Experience
Creating the Association for Library Collections and
Technical Services (ALCTS) Minimum Digitization Capture Recommendation.” The goal of this project was to establish an acceptable
minimum standard to ensure sustainability and viability into the future. The guiding
principles of the project were to create a standard which was high enough to
meet adequacy, in line with other recommendations and projects, basic enough
for novices to use, and accurate enough for experts and did not duplicate existing
work.
The evening concluded with a fun discussion on
metadata, which nonetheless had serious undertones. George Blood of George
Blood Audio|Video|Film discussed how we as librarians are “describing ourselves
to death” and what he saw as “the failures of metadata.” He began by
affirming that he is a metadata pessimist because no one asks “What problem are
we trying to solve?” or “What are we trying to provide metadata for?” Most
metadata is collected “just because we can” and because of this we do not test
our metadata. The variety of metadata standards across and within institutions
is staggering. Sometimes metadata standardization costs more than digitization
itself. Blood encouraged the audience to consider what a standard is, whether a
standard needs to be perfect, the implications of local modifications, and
whether there is a one-size-fits-all solution.
For the next day’s “unconference,” approximately
50 attendees convened to propose and vote on sessions. The largest sessions included “Making the
case for digital preservation,” “Let’s discuss a consortium data center,” and
“How do we approach becoming a regional hub of DPLA?” The smaller breakout
sessions included discussions on minimal standards for archival description,
engaging leadership and encouraging organizational responsibility for digital
projects, approaching rights and access issues, metrics for evaluation of digital
archival resources, new technologies in digitization, and teaching digital preservation
in library science and graduate archival programs. Notes from these sessions
will be forthcoming on the event web page.
NDSA Regional meetings offer opportunities for
local institutions to connect with one another and become informed on national
trends in digital stewardship, moving beyond their community and regional concerns
to consider and strategize the digital preservation of our nation’s cultural
heritage.
Nicole Scalessa, IT Manager
The Library Company of Philadelphia
nscalessa@librarycompany.org
www.librarycompany.org
The Library Company of Philadelphia
nscalessa@librarycompany.org
www.librarycompany.org
Digitalization is where the future lies and must be pursued with passion. I am an amateur historian researching and writing about Thomas Livezey (1723-1790), Germantown Quaker merchant flour miller. I cannot afford to do al the travel that PhD students can afford (since many study at UPENN, or have stipends for expenses. But most scholars teach and too busy to do enough research which is being filled by people like myself who have the time now that I'm retired. Please break down the old academic stuffiness that is so prevalent in your profession to make much more history available to the masses like Alfred Young wrote much about...thanks
ReplyDelete